Farrodes xingu Domínguez, Molineri & Peters, 1996

Distribution. Brazil (Pará, Maranhão and Goiás). New Record: Tocantins

Material examined. BRAZIL, Tocantins, Wanderlândia, Assentamento Costa Rica (balneário Águas Lindas), 6°52’3”S / 47°56’46”W, 09-10.x.2018, white sheet light trap, Krolow, T . K. and team cols. (23♂, CEUFT); Araguaína, rio próximo à ponte (EMZV), 7°6’7”S / 48°12’6”W, 08.x.2018, white sheet light trap, Krolow, T . K. and team cols. (5♂, CEUFT); Palmas, distrito de Taquaruçu do Porto, vale do Vai Quem Quer, 10°22’0.9”S / 48°8’1”W, 15- 16.xi.2017, U. V . light pan trap, Krolow, T . K. coll. (2♂, CEUFT); idem, 11-12.vii.2018, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (1♂, CEUFT); idem, 05-06.xii.2018, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (1♂, CEUFT); idem, 27-30.viii.2019, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (30♂, CEUFT); idem, fazenda Buritizal, 10°17’9”S / 48°3’13”W, 28.iii.2018, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (3♂, CEUFT); idem, cachoeira do Evilson, 10°14’0.2”S / 48°7’17”W, 13.vii.2018, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (22♂, CEUFT); Monte do Carmo, fazenda Maria (rio Sucuri), 10°46’21”S / 48° 5’19”W, 13- 14.ii.2019, U. V . light pan trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (8♂, CEUFT); idem, 03-05.iv.2019, white sheet light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (34♂, CEUFT); idem, 03-05.iv.2019, U. V . light pan trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (11♂, CEUFT); idem, 04-05.iv.2019, Pennsylvania light trap, Fernandes, A.S. and team cols. (1♂, CEUFT); Taguatinga, caminho para cachoeira do Registro (ribeirão Sobrado), 12°47’37”S / 46°30’38”W, 14.vi.2018, white sheet light trap, Krolow, T . K. and team cols. (7♂, CEUFT); Lavandeira, rio Palmas, 12°47’37”S / 46°30’38”W, 13-14.vi.2018, white sheet light trap, Krolow, T . K. and team cols. (10♂, CEUFT) .

Remarks. This species can easily be confused with Farrodes tepui Domínguez, Molineri & Peters 1996, and the main features to differentiate them are highly variable, such as the pigmentation on abdomen and forceps (abdominal segments with broad whitish marks and segment I of the forceps greyish-brown on F. xingu versus abdominal segments with small whitish marks and proximal 1/2 of segment I of the forceps yellowish-brown, distal 1/2 yellowish-white on F. tepui). It is one of the species with the greatest spatial distribution in the state, being found in eight sampled sites located in areas with Amazon and Cerrado influences.