Gynotyphlus perpusillus (Dodero, 1900)

MATERIAL EXAMINED. ROMANIA: Ion Corvin, 3.XI.2017, 44.092°N 27.813°E: 1 ex. (cStr) ; Dumbăveni, 3.XI.2017, 43.935°N 28.001°E: 7 exs. (cStr) ; Floriile, 3.XI.2017, 44.137°N 27.834°E: 2 exs. (cStr) ; Tărguşor 4.XI.2017, 44.495°N 28.476°E: 8 exs. (cStr) ; Fântâna Mare 5.XI.2017, 44.869°N 28.465°E: 3 exs. (cStr) ; Gradina 4.XI.2017, 44.500°N 28.447°E: 2 exs. (cStr) ; Tărguşor 27.III.2019, 44.495°N 28.476°E: 14 exs. (cStr) ; Tărguşor 31. V.2016, 44°27’56’’N 28°28’28’’E: 1 ex. (HNHM); Tărguşor 28. VI.2015, 44°27’56’’N 28°28’28’’E: 5 exs. (HNHM); Tărguşor 3. VI.2016, 44°51’44’’N 28°41’24’’E: 2 exs. (HNHM); Tărguşor 01. VI.2016, 44°27’51’’N 28°28’17’’E: 9 exs. (HNHM).

COMMENTS. This parthenogenetic species, new for Romania, seems widespread and common near the coast. There are subspecies described, but on characteristics that on my experience have too much variation within other species to define subspecies.