Scydmaenus (Mascarensia) australiensis Franz
Scydmaenus (Mascarensia) australiensis Franz, 1975: 282 .
(Figs 95–108, 197)
Type material studied. Holotype (AUSTRALIA: NORTHERN TERRITORY): ♂ (Fig. 103), labels illustrated in Fig. 191: “ Port Darwin. / 92—2.” [brownish, with longitudinal red line at middle, printed], “4668” [brownish, printed], “ Holo- / type” [white circle with red margins, printed], “ Scydmaenus / ( Mascarensia) / australiensis m. / det. H.Franz ” [white, handwritten and printed], “Typus” [red, handwritten] (BNHM).
Additional material studied. QUEENSLAND: 2 ♂♂, Halensvale, 03.10.1988, Richard Bejsak, under bark (ANIC, cPJ) .
Revised diagnosis. Each elytral apex in male with small patch of long light setae surrounding small asetose impression (Fig. 100); metafemoral pit (Fig. 102) large and deep, with proximal margin diffuse; aedeagus (Figs 105–108) with distal broadened region indistinctly demarcated from narrow proximal portion, not capitate, weak constriction situated near middle of median lobe.
Redescription. Body of male (Figs 103–104) slightly flattened, elongate and slender, BL 1.30–1.35 mm; pigmentation uniformly light brown with umbra-reddish hue, appendages indistinctly lighter; cuticle moderately glossy, covered with vestiture of setae slightly lighter than body.
Head (Figs 95–96) in dorsal view transversely subrectangular, broadest at eyes, HL 0.23 mm, HW 0.25–0.28 mm; vertex and frons confluent and weakly convex, posterior margin of vertex weakly concave, evenly arcuate; tempora as long as about 1.5 × length of eye in dorsal view; supraantennal tubercles indistinct; frons over antennal fossae broadly subtriangular and with rounded anterior margin. Eyes small, nearly semicircular in shape, indistinctly emarginate posteriorly and oblique in relation to long axis of head. Punctures on frons and vertex fine, inconspicuous; setae short, sparse, suberect, those on tempora as sparse as those on head dorsum. Genae (Fig. 96) as sparsely setose as frons and vertex. Anterior (exposed) region of head capsule demarcated from neck region by broad abrupt impression around occipital constriction, anterior margin of gular plate on neck region accentuated by small rounded anteriorly-directed projection. Submentum (Fig. 97) with pair of large submental lobes, each elongate and tapering anteriorly, with truncate anterior margin, gap between lobes narrower than width of each lobe, so that only narrow median region of mentum is exposed between lobes; hypostomal ridges (Fig. 97) extend mesally and anteriorly to connect at middle behind submental lobe, their median transverse portion slightly diffuse. Antennae (Figs 98, 103–104) moderately long, slender, AnL 0.60–0.65 mm; three terminal antennomeres forming moderately sharply delimited club; scape slightly more than 3 times as long as broad, distinctly broadening distally; pedicel twice as long as broad; antennomeres 3–5 each 1.5–1.8 × as long as broad, 6 and 7 each indistinctly elongate and distinctly asymmetrical, 8 about as long as broad and distinctly asymmetrical, 9 indistinctly elongate, 10 about as long as broad, 11 1.6 × as long as broad, slightly shorter than 9–10 together, indistinctly asymmetrical, with blunt apex; proximal and middle antennomeres with sparse long suberect setae, antennomeres 9–11 each covered with short, dense and weakly suberect setae and with less numerous long erect setae.
Pronotum in dorsal view (Fig. 95) weakly elongate, broadest near anterior third, PL 0.40–0.43 mm, PW 0.33– 0.35 mm; anterior and lateral margins confluent and rounded; posterior corners obtuse-angled and blunt; posterior margin weakly arcuate; base with narrow and indistinct posterior marginal carina and with two pairs of indistinct, shallow and diffuse small antebasal pits. Pronotal disc covered with fine and inconspicuous punctures; setae similar to those on frons and vertex, short, moderately dense, suberect. Ventrally (Fig. 96) prothorax with nearly asetose and impunctate hypomera and basisternal region much longer than procoxal rests, sparsely covered with short recumbent setae, with short anterior ‘collar’ and distinct vestiges of notosternal sutures visible as notches on sides of anterior prothoracic margin; hypomeral ridges distinct and complete, demarcating narrow inner (adcoxal) region of each hypomeron, anteriorly running along procoxal rests and connecting at middle to form biarcuate anteprocoxal carina demarcating basisternal region posteriorly.
Elytra (Figs 100, 103–104) slightly rhomboidal, broadest slightly in front of middle, EL 0.68–0.70 mm, EW 0.45–0.50 mm, EI 1.40–1.50. Humeral calli present but weakly elevated; basal impression on each elytron barely marked; basal elytral foveae lacking; apices (Fig. 100) separately rounded, each slightly flattened and bearing conspicuous patch of dense long yellowish setae directed posteriorly and outwards, surrounding small impressed asetose area. Punctures fine and inconspicuous; setae (except those on apical portions) similar to those on pronotum. Hind wings fully developed.
Mesoventrite (Fig. 99) with broad, parallel-sided subrectangular mesoventral intermesocoxal process posteriorly touching short and equally broad anterior metaventral process, border between processes distinctly marked by transverse fissure. Metanepisterna (Fig. 99) narrow and completely demarcated from metaventrite. Metaventral intermetacoxal process (Fig. 99) broad and short, with distinctly concave posterior margin, so that its lateral portions form short subtriangular processes projecting posteriorly; distance between metacoxae subequal to half width of metaventrite at its posterior margin and wider than width of metacoxa. Metaventrite (Fig. 99) weakly convex, slightly flattened at middle, unmodified and evenly covered with sparse, short, nearly recumbent setae.
Legs (Figs 96, 99, 101–102) moderately long and slender; unmodified, except for flattened and impressed proximal portion of metafemur (Figs 101–102) which bears large and deep pit with diffuse proximal margin, where surface of femur is covered with scale-like microsculpture contrasting with smooth surrounding areas; protarsi nearly cylindrical, narrow, lacking tenent setae. Protarsomeres 1–4 each indistinctly elongate, 5 only twice as long as broad; meso- and metatarsi of equal length, both distinctly longer that protarsi, each with tarsomere 1 nearly twice as long as broad, tarsomeres 2–4 about 1.5 × as long as broad, and tarsomere 5 2.5 × as long as broad.
Aedeagus (Figs 105–108) elongate but not very slender, AeL 0.28 mm, in dorsal view median lobe broadest near distal 1/4, apical region suboval, delimited from narrow proximal region by shallow and broad constriction, apical margin broadly rounded; ostium situated in distal 1/4 of median lobe; flagellum with broad loops just proximal to ostium in resting position; median lobe lacking setae.
Female. Unknown
Distribution. Northern (N Northern Territory) and eastern (SE Queensland) Australia.
Remarks. The two known localities where S. australiensis have been collected are over 2,800 km apart in a straight line. The northern one is located within the western tropical zone, while the southeastern site is in the northernmost area of the temperate zone. The holotype from the Northern Territory (Fig. 103) is slightly stouter than males from Queensland (Fig. 104), but no differences in the aedeagi was found between all available specimens, and the apical elytral modification is also identical (although in the holotype some of the subapical setae are broken off). It is possible that this species occurs in the entire forested area along the eastern and northern coast, but it seems to be one of the rarest Australian species of Scydmaenus .