Semicephalops folium sp. nov.
Figs 78–93, 108
Diagnosis. Male. Antenna with scape and pedicel dark brown, postpedicel brown, the latter acute. Frontal triangle with inconspicuous brown callus. Coxae brown to black, trochanters dark yellow, femora dark brown to black, with bases and apices yellow, with long setae ventrally, and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterolaterally, tibiae yellow. Abdomen dark brown, shiny, tergite 1 gray-brown pruinose. Surstyli subsymmetrical, shorter than epandrium length; with outer and inner margins somewhat straight, lower margin sinuous. Apex of phallic guide short, with acute tip and translucent lobe laterally. Phallus unbranched, with leaf-shaped membranous projections laterally and dorsally. Ejaculatory apodeme needle-shaped, with margins somewhat straight.
Description. MALE (holotype). Body length 2.3 mm. Head (Figs 78–79). Eyes contiguous for 10 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.2, 0.3. Frontal triangle gray pruinose, with inconspicuous brown callus. Postcranium brown, laterally and ventrally gray pruinose, dorsally brown pruinose.Antenna (Fig. 80) with scape and pedicel dark brown, scape with one seta dorsally, pedicel with four setae dorsally, and three medium setae ventrally; postpedicel brown, with acute apex. LPP/WPP = 3.3. Thorax (Figs 78–79, 81). Postpronotal lobe dark brown. Scutum dark brown, shiny, brow pruinose. Notopleuron concolorous with the scutum, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum dark brown, shiny, brown pruinose, with few tiny, scattered setae and 10 conspicuous setae along posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite dark brown, shiny, gray-brown pruinose. Wing (Fig. 82). Length 5.6 mm. LW/MWW = 3.3; LTC/ LFC = 0.3. Membrane slightly brown infuscate, anal lobe narrow; vein r-m located slightly before basal third of upper section of cell dm. Halter stem whitish yellow, knob brown. Legs (Fig. 78). Coxae brown to black; trochanters dark yellow; femora dark brown to black, with bases and apices yellow, with long setae ventrally and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterolaterally; tibiae yellow, with brown spots at distal third; tarsomeres 1–3 dark yellow, 4-5 brown; pulvilli yellow. Abdomen (Figs 78–79, 83). Dark brown, shiny, tergite 1 velvety gray-brown pruinose, with five black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–5 velvety gray pruinose, with inconspicuous setae, tergites, and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 84. Syntergosternite 8 dark brown, brown pruinose, shorter than length to tergite 5, with a membranous area large, dividing the syntergosternite 8 ventrally and reaching epandrium (Figs 83, 85). Terminalia (Figs 84–90). Epandrium dark brown, surstyli light brown (Fig. 85). Surstyli (Figs 85–87) subsymmetrical, shorter than epandrium length, completely setose; with outer and inner margins somewhat straight, lower margin sinuous (Fig. 85); left surstylus slightly shorter and thinner than right, both surstyli with tips rounded and downward directed when seen in lateral view (Figs 86–87). Gonopods subsymmetrical, right gonopod slightly thicker than left (Fig. 88). Apex of phallic guide short, with acute tip and a translucent lobe laterally (Fig. 89). Ejaculatory apodeme needle-shaped, with margins somewhat straight (Fig. 90). Phallus unbranched, with leaf-shaped membranous projections laterally and dorsally (Fig. 89). FEMALE (Figs 91–93). Like male, differing only in the following aspects: Body length 4.1 mm. Eyes dichoptic. Frontal ommatidia larger than adjacent ones. Wing length 5 mm. LW/MWW = 3.1. LTC/LFC = 0.2. Ovipositor OL: 0.77 mm, PL: 0.46 mm, B: 0.33 mm; base brown sparsely grayish-pruinose, piercer light-brown, except base brown, apex shiny, straight (Figs 92–93).
Type material. HOLOTYPE. Male: COLOMBIA, Boyacá, SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, Qda.[Quebrada] Carrizal, 0258’N/7811’W, 3350 m [eters], 24.feb[ii].–09.mar[iii].2001, P. Reina “M1358 (1 ♂ IAvH) (photographed specimen). PARATYPES. idem (1 ♀ LEUA); idem (2 ♂ IAvH); idem (2 ♂ INPA); idem 01– 23.Sep[ix].2000, “M614 (1 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem (2 ♂ LEUA); idem 07–21. Ene [i].2001, “M1250 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem 04–21.dec[xii].2000, “M1078 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem 02–22.xiii.2001, “M2026 (1 ♂ LEUA); idem 07–24.feb[ii].2001, “M1273 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem Cab[aña] Mamarramos, 0525’N/7327’W, 2855 m [eters], 13.nov[xi].–04.dic[xii].2001, “M1063 (5 ♂, 1 ♀ IAvH) (photographed specimen); idem (1 ♂, 5 ♀ LEUA); idem 04–21.dec[xii].2001, “M1080 (4 ♂ IAvH); idem 01–13.nov[xi].2000, “M829 (1 ♂ LEUA); idem (1 ♂ INPA); idem (1 ♂ INPA); idem 13–30.jul[vii].2000, “M380 (9 ♂ IAvH); idem (1 ♂ IAvH); idem 01–17. Aug [viii].2000, (11 ♂, 5 ♀ IAvH); idem (1 ♂ LEUA); idem (1 ♀ INPA); idem 23. May [v]–08.jun[vi].2000, (3 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem (1 ♂ LEUA); idem 23. Sep [ix]–1. Oct [x].2000, (6 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem 0525’12’’N/7327’24’’W, 17.viii–01.xi.2000, (13 ♂, 7 ♀ IAvH); idem Malaise4, 11–19.iv.2000, (1 ♀ IAvH); idem 25.jun[vi]–13.jul[vii].2000, (8 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem (2 ♂ LEUA); idem 01–19.iv.2000, (6 ♂ IAvH); idem Malaise, 25–28.ii.2000, M. Sharkey leg. “M3300 (2 ♀ IAvH); idem 21.xii.[2000]– 07.i.2003, P. Reina leg. “M1072 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem Cabaña Carrizal, 01.–23.Sep[ix].2000, “M614 (26 ♂ IAvH); idem 02–22.viii.2001, “M2026 (3 ♂ IAvH); idem Lagunillas, 0626’N/7327’W, 3380 m [eters], 09–28.iii.2001, “M1511 (6 ♂ IAvH); idem 19.vii–03.viii.2001, “M1969 (2 ♂ IAvH); idem 03–23.viii.2001, “M2024 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem 09–24.feb[ii].2001, “M1272 (6 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem (1 ♀ LEUA); idem Cabaña Chaina, 0525’N/7327’W, 2600 m [eters], 31.viii– 16.xi.2001, A. Roberto, “M2066 (1 ♀ INPA); idem Qda.[Quebrada] Los Francos, 0525’N/7327’W, 1270 m [eters], 07–24.feb[ii].2001, P. Reina “M1270 (3 ♀ IAvH); idem (1 ♀ LEUA); idem Cundinamarca, PNN[Parque Nacional Natural] Chingaza, Valle del Frailejon, 0431’N/7345’W, 3170 m [eters], 05–19.jan[i].2001, L. Cifuentes “M1221 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem 20.jul[vii]–03.ago [viii].2000, A. Perez (2 ♂, 2 ♀ IAvH); idem 06–20.jul [vi].2000, (2 ♂ IAvH); idem (1 ♀ INPA); idem 10–24.nov[xi].2000, “M872 (1 ♀ IAvH); idem 12–28.sep[ix].2000, “M736 (2 ♀, 1 ♀ IAvH); idem 28.sep[ix]–13.oct[x].2000, “M806 (1 ♂, 1 ♀ IAvH); idem 02–17.ago[viii].2000, “M526 (3 ♀ IAvH); idem (1 ♀ LEUA); idem (1 ♀ INPA); idem 31.aug[viii]–13.sep[ix].2001, “M732 (1 ♂, 3 ♀ IAvH); idem “M303 (2 ♀ IAvH); idem 17–31.ago[viii].2000, A. García (3 ♂, 1 ♀ IAvH); idem La Siberia, 0431’N/7345’W, 3170 m [eters], 01–13.iv.2001, A. Raigozo leg. “M1588 (1 ♂ IAvH); idem Valle del Cauca, PNN[Parque Nacional Natural] Farallones de Cali, Cgto.[Corregimiento] La Meseta, 0334’N/7640’W, 1960 m [eters], 22.viii–10.xi.2003, S. Sarria & M. Losso leg. “M4549 (1 ♀ IAvH); idem Nariño, R.N. [Reserva Natural] La Planada Centro Administrativo, 0115’N/7815’W, 1700 m [eters], 09–12.viii.2004, D. Arias leg. “M4901 (1 ♀ IAvH); Sendero de los osos, “M4899 (1 ♀ IAvH) . Holotype with left wing mounted on a microslide with Canada balsam. Right antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along the specimen.
Etymology. From the Latin folium (= leaf), the specific epithet refers to the shape of the ejaculatory ducts of phallus in the male genitalia.
Geographical distribution. Colombia (Boyacá, Cundinamarca, Valle del Cauca, Nariño) (Fig. 108) .
Habitat. The specimens were collected at the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region; Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza with ‘frailejón’ vegetation of the Andean region; Parque Nacional Natural Farallones de Cali, where the vegetation is composed of forests of the mountain range of the Southwest region and in the Reserva Natural La Planada, where the vegetation is composed of cloudy forest of the Southwest region of Colombia.
Taxonomic notes. Based on males and due to the shape of the surstyli, S. folium sp. nov. is similar in appearance to S. paganus (Hardy) [see figure 31 presented by Rafael (1990)]. It differs from S. paganus by having the apex of phallic guide short, with acute tip and translucent lobe laterally (Fig. 89) [versus apex of phallic guide thickened, with truncated tip and two rigid lobes apically, figure 33 presented by Rafael (1990)]; phallus with leaf-shaped membranous projections laterally and dorsally (Fig. 89) [versus phallus with membranous projections rounded laterally, figure 33 presented by Rafael (1990)]; ejaculatory apodeme needle-shaped, with margins somewhat straight (Fig. 90) [versus ejaculatory apodeme mushroom-shaped, figure 34 presented by Rafael (1990)].